RE: [FT] Wave Gun (was: OU & IC & FB3)
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:50:20 -0500
Subject: RE: [FT] Wave Gun (was: OU & IC & FB3)
I misread what you intended. I thought that
you meant the area of coverage would be the
entire front arc (60 degrees).
Now I see that you meant to have the regular
cone, but have the long axis of the cone to
be anywhere in the front arc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mancini [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:37 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: [FT] Wave Gun (was: OU & IC & FB3)
> >From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
> >You have the arc WAY too wide for the current wave gun. It is 2mu
> >wide for the first 12mu, 3mu for the 2nd, and 4mu wide for the 3rd.
> How is that any different than what I wrote?
> >>Range 36" (progressive area, 2",3",4" for each 12 inches)
> Other than the fact that " should be mu as per Fleet Book 2.