Prev: Re: Fond Farewell Next: Re: Chits vs. Dice

Oerjan Ohlson's Wet Dreams

From: "Peter Mancini" <peter_mancini@m...>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:05:32 EST
Subject: Oerjan Ohlson's Wet Dreams

Hmmm, wet dreams about infantry carried AT weaponry...	Yikes.

Ok, I see your point.  That is an tough analysis.  However, even so,
even if 
it doesn't make perfectly logical sense - tanks without infantry cover
die 
like bugs if they get too close to infantry.  This has been well proven 
during and since WWII.	I am not saying the system doesn't need to be
looked 
at (your analysis leads me to believe it does) but everything is in
motion 
and the battlefield is not a billiards table.  Just because you are
firing 
from the front arc on the gaming table doesn't mean that at some point
the 
vehicle moved and gave you an alternative and softer point to hit.  (I
am 
speaking about an abstraction here that Jon may or may not have
intended.)

Upon reflection, 10% does seem a bit high.

Anyway, about your wet dreams... I have a psychiatrist I could
recommend.  
She does wonders.

--Peter
P.S. and yes I know from first hand experience.

___________________________________________________________
Get more from your time online.  FREE MSN Explorer download : 
http://explorer.msn.com

Prev: Re: Fond Farewell Next: Re: Chits vs. Dice