RE: UNSC fleet carrier design
From: Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 18:43:49 +0100
Subject: RE: UNSC fleet carrier design
In message <4.2.2.20000921110742.00a3a770@pop.hba.marine.csiro.au>
Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au> wrote:
> G'day Charles,
>
> >Well, have you seen the figure! (it is a) big...
>
> It is but I wouldn't say it was that much bigger than the Jeanne
D'Arc, so
> making 340+ mass is probably a little on the high side. Maybe 300 at a
> push. Didn't one of the guys on the list use to actually weigh the
figures
> to compare masses? Wonder how the UN CV vs the Jeanne D'Arc would work
out....
>
> Just my 2 razoos.
>
> Beth
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Funny you should mention that... I did actually weigh my other UN models
and compated them with my KV models and a FSE BDN - unfortunately, my
scales arn't very accurate for low weight items, so the results were a
guideline at best.
Ok, tried again (all results are approximate),
Ship Figure Weight Ship MASS
Bonaparte BDN 80gm 160
UNSC Gaia SDN-X 120gm 240 (approx)
UNSC Fleet Carrier 155gm 330 (approx)
Hmm.. different again, I think I over-estimated the SDN-X weight -
<sigh> well, back to the drawing board :-| Carrier isn't far out though
:-)
You right, however, 342 is rather on the large size (by 12 MASS) - I'm
trying to cut it down a bit. :-)
I'm not overly fixated on the weight, I did the original weighing
exercise as the quickest way of geting a rough comparison on sizes.
And this only has any baring on the ship MASSes if we assume that all
human build ships have roughly the same densities :-)
How much does the Jeanne D'Arc figure weigh in at anyway :-)
Charles
--