Prev: Re: GenCon FT Tournament Fleet Results Next: Re: DragonFlight 2000

Re: DragonFlight 2000

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: DragonFlight 2000

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 stiltman@teleport.com wrote:

> >  >I always play vector, and the
> >  >larger burst radius of cinematic PBLs caught me. (I prefer vector,
it's
> >  >more interesting & challenging...)
>  
> > The what??? Would've caught me by surprise too! Was this a
house-rule you 
> > adopted for cinematic or have I misunderstood here?
> 
> The way I understood it, was that he has a house rule whereby plasma
bolts
> only affect a 3 MU radius rather than a 6 MU radius.	When we played
by the
> 6 MU radius something got goofed in his perspective or something.

In FB2, PBLs have a stated burst radius of 6". Later in the PBL column,
it
is strongly suggested that in vector the radius be cut to 4" or even 3".
We use the 3" radius with vector.

I maneuvered my squadron to be right behind my own PBL bursts - if
they'd
been the 3" vector bursts I'm used to... I got caught by the 6"
cinematic
bursts in use.

Brian - yh728@victoria.tc.ca -
- http://warbard.iwarp.com/games.html -

> -- 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  The Stilt Man		stiltman@teleport.com
>    http://www.teleport.com/~stiltman/stiltman.html
>    < We are Microsoft Borg '98.  Lower your expectations and	  >
>    < surrender your money.  Antitrust law is irrelevant.	  >
>    < Competition is irrelevant.  We will add your financial and >
>    < technological distinctiveness to our own.  Your software   >
>    < will adapt to service ours.  Resistance is futile.	  >
> 

Prev: Re: GenCon FT Tournament Fleet Results Next: Re: DragonFlight 2000