RE: Expanded EW suggestion (was MT Missile Questions)
From: "Jarrard, Jonathan (J.)" <jjarrard@f...>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:52:12 -0400
Subject: RE: Expanded EW suggestion (was MT Missile Questions)
Actually, I'd always assumed the D6 that you roll to see how much of a
salvo
hits was already reflecting ECM 'spoofing'. If you're going to do that
twice, then missiles had better become both cheaper and less massive.
-----Original Message-----
From: stiltman@teleport.com [mailto:stiltman@teleport.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 3:45 PM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Expanded EW suggestion (was MT Missile Questions)
If I were to adapt it for FB-based games, I'd probably keep the above
for
MT missiles and make SML's roll against an extra d6 _before_ PDS is
accounted for in order to hit (i.e. missiles are probably not going to
meaningfully hit a well-PDS'ed, ECM-protected ship at all).