Re: Retrograde gimmickry
From: stiltman@t...
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 21:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Retrograde gimmickry
> In the circle i play in, if you are in a position where there is no
clear
> objective (in most scenarios with an objective, the retrograde tactic
falls
> flat on its face),
Yeah... that's basically it. What wartime operation is a skirmisher
going to
be able to fulfill? If you need to provide cover while you're
conducting
troop landings or evacuations, skirmishers are useless. If you need to
defend
a planet under concentrated attack, the only reason they'd be any use at
all
is if they had the luxury of a week between FTL and planetfall, and they
lose
even that if the enemy has fast drives, cloaking devices, or reflex
fields.
If it needs to press in on a layered defense net of patrols at an enemy
planet,
it's going to be pretty useless. Neither can it present a particularly
daunting defense grid of its own; surgical FTL placement or cloaking
devices
will both defeat their purposes as such just by being there.
> and it looks like a (very boring) loss is almost certain,
> you fire up your ftl drives and piss off.
Yup... let them have the open space. Nothing there but dust. :)
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The Stilt Man stiltman@teleport.com
http://www.teleport.com/~stiltman/stiltman.html
< We are Microsoft Borg '98. Lower your expectations and >
< surrender your money. Antitrust law is irrelevant. >
< Competition is irrelevant. We will add your financial and >
< technological distinctiveness to our own. Your software >
< will adapt to service ours. Resistance is futile. >