Re: leader loss
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@i...>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:22:43 -0400
Subject: Re: leader loss
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:39:00 -0400, "Thomas.Barclay"
<Thomas.Barclay@cbu.xwavesolutions.com> wrote:
>In addition to my normal suppression from casualties, I take ANOTHER
for
>leader loss? I can't say as I've ever noticed that, but it could be so.
It's buried in the rules. I just blundered into it two days ago when I
completely read the leader replacement rules.
> Do I
>also have to do a re-org to appoint a new leader?
No. It appears that the suppression marker represents the confusion of
having
to find a new leader.
What I'm not sure about is what quality roll do you use for morale loss
when a
leader dies? I think the rules for leader replacement say something like
a
leader casualty is replaced "immediately", which I interpret to mean
things
happen like this: casualties are inflicted, a new leader is chosen (roll
for
leadership level change), roll for morale effects. Now, of course, you
add
another suppression marker, too.
I haven't had it happen, but you should also keep track of the old
leadership
value, just in case you roll for the leader casualty and the leader is
alive
and okay.
>If you had to do both,
>you'd sure be penalized (in addition to the confidence issues.....).
Nope, no need to re-org. The new leader is chosen automatically. If the
quality drops, you MAY want to re-org to see if the leader is okay.
Allan Goodall agoodall@interlog.com
Goodall's Grotto: http://www.interlog.com/~agoodall/
"Surprisingly, when you throw two naked women with sex
toys into a living room full of drunken men, things
always go bad." - Kyle Baker, "You Are Here"