RE: [DS] Specialist Elements

>From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: "'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'" <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
>Subject: RE: [DS] Specialist Elements
>Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:05:52 -0400
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	John M. Atkinson [SMTP:john.m.atkinson@erols.com]
> > Sent:	Thursday, April 20, 2000 11:00 AM
> > To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> > Subject:	Re: [DS] Specialist Elements

> > No.  But since I think he's talking about something I said, I
suggested
> > 2 chits, validity as per IAVR, vulnerable to PDS and ECM like
regular
> > GMS.  12" range.  Points +10/+15/+20 for B/E/S.
> >
> > John
>-----End Original Message-----
>
>And my suggestion was normal GMS validity. ECM/PDS as normal, 1 chit
vs.
>armor, 3 chits vs infantry, 16" range, limited ammo (like artillery).
Cost
>is 1/2 GMS/L
>-----
>Brian Bell
>bkb@beol.net
>http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/ds2/
>-----
>

Hmmm... I remember John's suggestion, as posted above, it was in
response to 
my question about them... it seems we all have our own minor preferences

about the subtle nuances og GMS/P's in DS, since as it's obvious from my

previous post, that I didn't stick with his exact numbers.  Whichever
set 
you go with, it just might be the perfect fit for the PA that were being

toyed with.

Brian B

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com