Re: Active vs Passive
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:50:04 EDT
Subject: Re: Active vs Passive
In a message dated 4/13/00 2:32:48 PM Central Daylight Time,
baqrt@mta.ca
writes:
<< Yes, that would work (somewhat), although how are you going to be
sure
which side is safe to radiate on? If you're wrong, you've just become
VERY visible. Also, doing this requires extra power (heat sinks are NOT
super-efficient), which therefore means you have to radiate more heat,
which means....
I'm just not sure it would be worth the effort.
>>
The point is do you radiate any heat at all into space - space hasno air
to
heat byradiation. At best to a sensor youwould be a pinprick - a hot one
determined only if you can read the surface temprature of the hull - the
waste heat would be read perhaps in em emiissions but would be a lot
less
noticeable than neutrino or particle emission, sensor or communicator
emission - running under EMCON you would just be a lump of metallic
composition indistinguishable from a planetoid - until you add thrust
and
start to maneuver THEN you stand out like a sore thumb from delta-vee
analysis and perhaps a drive plume.