Re: Active vs Passive
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:32:27 EDT
Subject: Re: Active vs Passive
In a message dated 4/13/00 12:01:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil writes:
<<
I do agree with your comment about range. Unless you or your opponenet
are
moving a significant amount, it would be difficult to determine range
using
passive sensors. This is why the closer you are to an object the easier
it
should be to deterine details.
>>
I think the best model available for sci-fi sensors (active and passive)
is
modern day submarine warfare. No, the first detection by passive sensors
gives one a HUGE possible range reading, but the submarine can alter
course -
triangulate the target's passive signature and work out a firing
solution
over time. I think that is what would happen in space combat.