Re: Was Support Weapons in SGII now DSII

If you'll go back and look again, you'll notice I stated that chit 
validities vs infantry remained the same - the validities you are
quoting 
are vs. VEHICLES, not infantry.  APSW/H's draw 4 chits vs. infantry and
use 
regular infantry firefight validities, and draw 1 chit vs. vehicles and
use 
the special validities I proposed.

SAVR's are Support Anti-Vehicle Rockets, a heavier version of IAVR's I 
proposed a while back and everyone else helped me perfect (hopefully).

Brian Bilderback

----Original Message Follows----
From: "John M. Atkinson" <john.m.atkinson@erols.com>
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: Was Support Weapons in SGII now DSII
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:44:10 -0400

Ah. . . Chit validity is already fixed for firefights.	If you want to
fiddle with it, you need to account for cover.	That's the primary
factor in whether or not fire vs. infantry is effective--it doesn't take
much to render a human combat ineffective, and most weapons don't
significantly loose effectiveness before gravity pulls them to the
ground.

 > SAVR's:

What's that?

John M. Atkinson

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com