RE: [SG] at 15mm (The Joys of Sixmm) [CLEAN STAMP]

OK, I've got to ask, why are smaller games of SG unsatisfactory? By
smaller
do you mean smaller than Coy/10 suads a side? Or smaller than Pl/4
squads a
side?

Owen G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sportyspam@harm.dhs.org [mailto:sportyspam@harm.dhs.org]
> Sent: Sunday, 27 February 2000 11:30
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: [SG] at 15mm (The Joys of Sixmm) [CLEAN STAMP]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Allan Goodall wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 26 Feb 2000 08:02:03 -0500, "Imre A. Szabo" 
> <ias@sprintmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > >The biggest problem with SG is that it takes too much time 
> to field battalion sized forces...  And 6mm let's you field 
> battalion sized forces...
> > 
> > Well, SG isn't intended for battalion sized games. That's 
> what DSII is for...
> > *S*
> 
>   Well, smaller games of SG II are often unsatisfying.  Of 
> course, having
> to call it a night half way through a game is even more so.  :)
>