Re: [SG] at 15mm
From: sportyspam@h...
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:05:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [SG] at 15mm
I bought some Heavy Gear infantry blisters. $8US for 20 figures is
not
bad. They're also more detailed than a lot of 25-30mm models I've seen.
Nice variety on weapons, decent uniforms. I'm not sure what size they
are, but they look about half the height of a 'normal' model.
I'm not really looking forward to painting them though. :)
A centimeter is about half the size of an inch, which is good for
models
that are half pints. :) Personally I'd keep weapon bands in inches and
take movement down to centimeters. But that might change the game more
than you'd want.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 Aron_Clark@digidesign.com wrote:
>
>
> Still considering the options of playing SG at 15mm, and getting
pretty jazzed
> about the whole idea. What I find so attractive is the idea that I
could
> theoretically play a SG game on 4x6 table which would be equivalent to
5.5x8.5
> (!) table at the 15mm scale. Why is that such a big deal? More play
space on
> the same surface area, coupled with the fact that I could actually
paint, field,
> and afford company strength deployments. This of course would require
the MU
> [measured units] to be reduced to the 15mm scale, which I don't see as
a
> problem. The way I figure, a standard ruler would need to be reduced
by 40% to
> provide the equivalent MU for 15mm as in 25mm.
>
> Am I off my rocker or does this seem to be a reasonable conclusion?
>
>