Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
From: JohnDHamill@a...
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 03:05:28 EST
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
Brendan Robertson wrote:
>Standard HEF artillery. A big boom, is a big boom (unless you're using
>nukes).
>Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
>[mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
>[pirates] Prince Rupert Raspberry; Base Commander
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian Bilderback [SMTP:bbilderback@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 12:09 PM
>> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>> Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
>>
>> Since we're talking about fire-based weapons, what about
aerosol/fuel-air
>> bombs? Any ideas on how to make those work in DS II?
>>
>> Brian B
Actually, FAE ( Fuel-Air Explosives) are considerably more powerful then
a
normal arty strike. During the Cold War, there was talk of not being
able to
use them in Europe during the Big One (TM), because they might be
mistaken
for tactical nukes.
There does need to be some way of representing them in DSII, maybe a
half-size nuke, without the rad effects...
My 2 credits...
John
JohnDHamill@aol.com