Re: Sensors vs. Counters.... the pain continues...
From: RWHofrich@a...
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 23:13:32 EST
Subject: Re: Sensors vs. Counters.... the pain continues...
In a message dated 2/4/00 5:41:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Thomas.Barclay@sofkin.ca writes:
> Fox the Mark I without foxing the human
> eye?
Uhhmmm--pardon me for intruding on this one, but I always thought the
Mark I
WAS the human eye...
...but point taken nonetheless.
All this arguing going on about this topic is getting silly--especially
when
it appears people are purposefully misinterpretting each other!
C'mon guys! I think we can all agree that in today's environment you
NEED
the Mark I working as much as possible, but frankly, who is to say for
100
years from now? I would have to guess that a passive broadband receptor
system that pipes its info into a VR system for the tanker MAY indeed
reduce
(if not eliminate) the need to "take a peek." It still won't eliminate
the
need to "take a pee" though ;-)
Rob
ps--I am defintely NOT a tanker--I just read a lot about military
history
(past, current, and future).