Re: Binary Propellant Guns
From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:21:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Binary Propellant Guns
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Thomas Barclay of the Clan Barclay wrote:
> 4: Go to an autoloader (it's about time).
Tankers generally hate the idea of an autoloader because if it caughs up
during a battle you are screwed.
Another bigger consideration is that an autoloader can't drive the tank
if the driver gets injured, it can't help repair a track or help
retension it, it cannot sit out at an OP during a lull and chat on the
sound powered telephone with the Platoon LT about the 4 BTRs it sees 2
kliks away at the crossroads. Loaders (the human kind) are critical in
daily life of keeping the tank healthy and performing duties other than
pulling a sabot round from the ammo bin and shoving it into the gun's
hungry mouth.
The addition of an Auto loader would require a major amount of
rethinking
general tanker doctrine and operations from day to day.
------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S - '72 Honda CB750K - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo -
------------------------------------------------------------------
- No more limits on the 2nd amendment. Enforce the extant laws -
------------------------------------------------------------------