Prev: Re: FT tactics vs slow ships, tiny ships are toast Next: Re: Campaign Game

RE: An apology for the unwashed Re: Heard at The Local Game Store ...

From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:10:05 -0500
Subject: RE: An apology for the unwashed Re: Heard at The Local Game Store ...

You could try my FMA enhancement for DS2:
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/ds2/ds2fma.html

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/ds2/	 
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Pugh [SMTP:steve@wickedweb.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 9:46 AM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: An apology for the unwashed Re: Heard at The Local
Game
> Store...
> 
> 
> > I don't have DSII yet, however, I do have SGII.  One of the things
> > mentionned in SGII is that SGII makes use of lessons learned from
> > DSII.  Are chits one of the things learned? 
> 
> I don't know. The chits are used for damage resolution and are, IMO, 
> quick and easy to use. 
> 
> > I like SGII, but I keep hearing about these chits and what a
> > nuisance they are in DSII. 
> 
> There's a very vocal minority which hates them. ;-)
> 
> > Has anyone done DSII sans chits or chit emulation? 
> 
> Several people. The fact that they involve computer programmes or 
> large tables rather proves the point that the chits give a wider 
> range of results than can easily be acheived with simple dice rolls.
> 
> It's just a case of whatever makes people happy really.
> 
>	Steve
> 
> -- 
> The Society of Fantasy and Science Fiction Wargamers
> <http://steve.pugh.net/SFSFW/>
> 
> Steve Pugh   <steve@pugh.net>   <http://steve.pugh.net/>


Prev: Re: FT tactics vs slow ships, tiny ships are toast Next: Re: Campaign Game