Prev: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology Next: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology

RE: Heavy Fighter Technology

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:01:41 +1100
Subject: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology

DSII: Aerospace operations, page 42, column 2, paragraph 3.

Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
[mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
[pirates] Prince Rupert Raspberry; Base Commander

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Martin [SMTP:Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 1:56 PM
> 
> > For example, the modern A-10 Warthog I would class as following:
Size 2,
> armour 1, Firecon: Sup A-G, MDC/3, DFO pods.	With maybe a special
rule
> that
> it can ignore the first *damaged* result, due to it's reputation of
coming
> back with 1/2 the airframe missing.
> 
> A10 relies on wings to fly. Antigrav and spaceship motors allows tanks
to
> fly!
> 
> Suggestions:
> Use a 2000% points cost for antigrav space fighters.
> Use very heavy air defence to oppose them.
> No GMS or disposable weapons (except torpedoes against space ships).
> 
> You wrote:
> > Especially as they ignore all special damage chits in DS (including
boom
> chits).
> I haven't heard of this rule before! :-\ What page is it on? Thanks!
> 
> Andrew Martin
> ICQ: 26227169
> Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz
> http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-


Prev: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology Next: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology