| Prev: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology | Next: Re: Transport designations | 
Bell, Brian K wrote:
> 
> I would suggest CH for Heavy Cruiser because I have seen CA also be
used for
> Fleet Auxiliary Cruisers. Same thing for Heavy (Attack) Carriers CVH.
> -----
> Brian Bell
     No offence ment to Brian, but this can only cause confusion and 
violate traditional IDs.
(CA was originally - Armored Cruiser)
Bye for now,
John L.
| Prev: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology | Next: Re: Transport designations |