Prev: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology Next: Re: Transport designations

Re: Decals

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:02:03 -0800
Subject: Re: Decals

Bell, Brian K wrote:
> 
> I would suggest CH for Heavy Cruiser because I have seen CA also be
used for
> Fleet Auxiliary Cruisers. Same thing for Heavy (Attack) Carriers CVH.
> -----
> Brian Bell

     No offence ment to Brian, but this can only cause confusion and 
violate traditional IDs.

(CA was originally - Armored Cruiser)

Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology Next: Re: Transport designations