RE: Heavy Fighter Technology

Look at:
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/sg/fighters.htm
It should be updated within the next couple of hours (should show the
heavy
fighter as size 5)

These are all designed according to SG/DS, which doesn't allow screens. 

To make heavy fighters under the rules, it required reactive armour (vs
GMS)
& PDS systems.	I still couldn't do much about direct fire weapons, but
there's a range difference between GMS & direct fire weapons anyway.

Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
[mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
[pirates] Prince Rupert Raspberry; Base Commander

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom.McCarthy [SMTP:Tom.McCarthy@sofkin.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 3:44 AM
> To:	'gzg-l@CSUA.BERKELEY.EDU'
> Subject:	Heavy Fighter Technology
> 
> Outside of the MKW game (where the GM/judge has ruled that human heavy
> fighters use screen technology), how many people feel that human heavy
> fighters use screens and how many thought they were just tougher (like
> armoured hull, etc.) ?
> 
> Just curious. I have, in the past, treated heavy fighters as if they
were
> heavier construction, not screened (for purposes of judging
vulnerability
> to
> enemy weapons, etc.)