Prev: Problems with Eudora Next: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology

RE: transport designations? [CLEAN STAMP]

From: "Rick Rutherford" <Rick@e...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:52:33 -0500
Subject: RE: transport designations? [CLEAN STAMP]

Hi Tom,

I thought "BC" was used for "BattleCruiser"?

-- Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Pope
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Sent: 1/11/00 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: transport designations?

"They came, they grabbed, we whomped" wrote:
> 
> ...and I put a listing (mainly for my own purposes :) on
> my fleet roster page:
> 
>      http://www.bcpl.net/~indy/full-thrust/fleet-rosters.html

Michael Sarno wrote:
> 
>     Here's the best I can do.  I'd favor the historically-based.

As do I.  Thanks to both of you for the lists.
Perhaps to keep things simple, how about the following:

AKH  Heavy Freighter
AK   Medium Freighter
AKL  Light Freighter
FT   Free Trader
AG   Fleet Auxillary
APA  Assault Transport
BC   Bulk Carrier
SL   Starliner

That at least gives some options for FB based non-combat vessels...

What do you think?

Tom

--
Thomas Pope
Human Computer Interaction Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~tpope

========================================================================
======
01/11/00 12:06:23

[INFO] -- Virus Manager:
This email message and any attachments were scanned by the WorldSecure
Server that protects Electronic Systems and it’s customers. No Viruses
were detected in this message.

========================================================================
======

Prev: Problems with Eudora Next: Re: Heavy Fighter Technology