Prev: Re: OT: Battleships vs. Carriers... Next: Decals

23rd Raider Group

From: Thomas Barclay of the Clan Barclay <kaladorn@h...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:42:10 -0500
Subject: 23rd Raider Group

Intelligence analysts query the Admiralty Press Office about the release
of the OB of the 23rd Raider group which makes no mention of the
Connestoga, and yet a picture in the gallery refers to it specifically.
Clearly either a dated photo... or is it...? Would it be beyond the
Admiralty to misinform the public and its foes by way of erroneous
information release? Suspicions abound.

Nice work, though I'd suggest the addition of a fairly speed provider
class ship with some decent PDS and carrying replacement fighter
squadrons as cargo if you want to make the group reasonably self
sufficient. Also an EW shp with area ECM might well be in order.

Good concept for a fleet though. :)

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Good? Bad? I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash, Army of Darkness

Homepage: http:\\fox.ntsn.ca\~kaladorn\index.html
ICQ: 58316640 (Tomin8tor)

"Ah. I see. Inform me if there is any change in his condition."
<hangs up the phone>
"How is he?"
"He's dead."
-- The movie Top Secret

Prev: Re: OT: Battleships vs. Carriers... Next: Decals