Re: UNSC SDN-X designs using Beth's EFSB Heavy Beams Systemsconversions

Hello everyone!

In a message dated 11/09/1999 4:14:14 PM Central Standard Time, 
beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au writes:

> I was wondering about the lack of pulse torps, was the
>  rationale that they'd developed the heavy beams as the high end pulse
torp
>  replacement? 
>  

Beth, you are absolutely right.  That is exactly what I was thinking. 
Now as 
I promised to everyone, here is a revision of the SDN-X.  

Bill

Revised UNSC SDN-X design
Hull Displacement 251
Point Cost 790 (+72 points for HBS)
Unallocated Mass 24 (all used for HBS)
Ship Type Military 
Hull Strength Average 
Hull Armor 12 
Streamlining None 
Thrust 3 
FTL Capable  
Passive Sensors  
Active Sensors Enhanced 
ECM Individual 
----------------------------------------------------
Fire Control System (4) 
PDS (6) 
ADFC (1) 
Heavy Beam Capacitor (class 6)
Heavy Beam Projector F
Heavy Beam Projector F
Heavy Beam Projector F
Beam / 3 F  
Beam / 3 F  
Beam / 2 FP F AP  
Beam / 2 F FS AS  
Beam / 1 FP F FS AP A AS  
Beam / 1 FP F FS AP A AS  
Beam / 1 FP F FS AP A AS  
Cargo Space H2 H2 H2 H2  
Screen Level 2
SML (2) FP F FS
SM Magazine Cap: 8 (4 / 2 ER salvos)