RE: Underwater questions [ot]
From: "Tim Jones" <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 16:35:47 -0000
Subject: RE: Underwater questions [ot]
>Okay, would high enfinshancy (sp?) fuel cells work?
Assume fusion power as in Hammers Blowers - basically limitless
you could then envisage some sort of caterpillar drive as in Hunt
for Red October. A mini version could power the torpedoes.
>I was thinking of an Aerobraking based insertion, would it
>work to have lateral movement when it hit the water?
VTTBS flying sub would be the way to go, this is SF.
>Would a KEP type weapon be practical?
Do you mean an orbital THOR type weapon?
A rail/gauss gun with a Fin Stabilised round
might work, you could invent a forcefield to keep the water out of
the electrics or have them waterproofed. It would be short range
due to friction. Something like a high energy harpoon gun.
Oher weapons could be invented to foul your opponents engines or
jets - like a cloud of stuff that if ssucked into the vents
disables the sub.
Someone mentioned SUBROC type standoff torpedoes they'd work too.
Rocket boost on surface to target area then - sonar to seek and
destroy.
>Hedgehog?
WWII anti-sub weapon basically a mortar that fires contact fused depth
charges - they only go off if they hit a sub.