Re: Combat Walkers - Chasis arrangement

That would be correct.	The spider may not be the best example of a
linear 
design, because it sits high on its legs, but that's the sort of thing
I'm 
thinking of.

Eli

>From: Ryan M Gill <monty@arcadia.turner.com>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>Subject: Re: Combat Walkers - Chasis arrangement
>Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:30:33 -0400 (EDT)
>
>On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Eli Arndt wrote:
>
> > Well, I was doing some tinkering and I realised that for CWs some
chasis
> > types don't justify the +1 to signature.  As a quick modifier to the

>rules I
> > came up with the following adjustment.
>
>Like the Spider from Battle Tech? It has a turret or fixed gun and 4
legs
>right?
>
> > Linear Chasis - These designs are those that stand low on multiple
legs.
> > They are comparable in height to other vehicles in their class and
as 
>such
> > have the same signature.  The trade off for these is that they mount

>weapons
> > in conventional configurations.  this means that they do not get the
> > mounting and firing arc bonuses that other Combat Walkers do.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>- Ryan Montieth Gill		 DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
>- ryan.gill@turner.com      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
>- rmgill@mindspring.com	      www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
>- '85 Honda CB700S  -	'72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo  -
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com