Prev: Re: [FMA] Unofficial suggestions for variant Next: Re: FMA Skirmish test results

Re: M-16 Replacement

From: Tom Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:09:51 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: M-16 Replacement

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 ScottSaylo@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/19/99 8:11:21 PM Central Daylight Time, 
> aebrain@dynamite.com.au writes:
> 
> << 
>  It also has AFAIK a Thermal Imager/Sight inferior to that on the
latest
>  version of the venerable M60A3(PI). Probably it's biggest drawback.
>  Still a good weapons system though.
>   >>
> 
> Not to mention there is no hatch to open in the bottom out of which to
take a 
> leak! A serious drawback to any tanker laden to his last plimsoll
marker.

surely there are some empty 120 mm shell cases lying about? improvise,
man!

tom

Prev: Re: [FMA] Unofficial suggestions for variant Next: Re: FMA Skirmish test results