Re: M-16 Replacement
From: Tom Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:09:51 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: M-16 Replacement
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 ScottSaylo@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 7/19/99 8:11:21 PM Central Daylight Time,
> aebrain@dynamite.com.au writes:
>
> <<
> It also has AFAIK a Thermal Imager/Sight inferior to that on the
latest
> version of the venerable M60A3(PI). Probably it's biggest drawback.
> Still a good weapons system though.
> >>
>
> Not to mention there is no hatch to open in the bottom out of which to
take a
> leak! A serious drawback to any tanker laden to his last plimsoll
marker.
surely there are some empty 120 mm shell cases lying about? improvise,
man!
tom