Re: [OFFICIAL] FMA TEST MATERIAL - PART 1 (rules)

>On Sun, 18 Jul 1999 23:15:18 +0100, Ground Zero Games writes:
>>>Well, all the responses so far seem positive, so I'm going to take  a
>>>chance and send this now..... <grin>
>>
>>[ENORMOUS SNIP!!]
>>
>>Gakkk, where did this pop up from?? It is the original all-in-one-lump
>>posting that I sent last week, which never arrived with anyone, hence
I
>>broke it down.... can anyone (Matt?) shed any light on where the heck
it
>>has now appeared from after all this time?  I think the Mailer Daemons
are
>>playing games with us mere mortals again....
>>
>>Jon (GZG)
>
>My fault.  I got back from my trip yesterday and was reading higher
>priority email (which doesn't include list traffic, but does include
>bounces).  I say the bounce and was pretty sure you'd have split it up
>and sent it on, but wasn't positive (and didn't want to delve into the
>2000+ email messages in my mailing lists folder).  So I just sent it
>on thinking at worst it would be redundant, and at best it would get
>out sooner.

Thanks for the explanation, Matt, and no problem. I was just curious as
to
how it happened. Won't the list server handle messages over a certain
size
without direct list admin intervention?

Jon (GZG)
>
>-=- Matthew L. Seidl		email: seidl@cs.colorado.edu		
   =-=
>=-= Graduate Student			Project . . . What Project?	
   -=-
>-=- http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~seidl/Home.html	  -Morrow Quotes
>=-=
>=-= http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~seidl/lawsuit
>-=-