Re: SHotguns!
From: Kenneth Winland <kwinland@c...>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: SHotguns!
Greetings!
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Thomas Barclay wrote:
> I've seen a broken firing pin once, I've seen a few cartridges torn in
> half by ejectors, I've seen triple feeds.... (that was a pain to
> clear) and I've seen actions just jam open...
<shudder>
:)
> As an aside - for you Americans - people keep talking about loading 30
> rounds into M-16 mags. Up here our rifle team guys load 28 rounds to
> ensure better feeding. Is it the fact we Canucks re-use the disposable
> mags?
That makes sense. A big problem with feeding is the quality of
the spring in the mag. It may be the Canuck propensity for re-using
*disposable* mags <g>, or it may just be a good idea.
One of the recent articles in one of the gun journals had a good
analysis on mags and capacity, focusing on police use. They recommended
*low* capacity, expensive mags as they did not jam or misfeed anywhere
*near* the level that cheap high capacity mags did. Some of the cheap
high cap 9mm mags actually FELL APART during some of the tests. :(
Laterish!
Ken