Re: More Fighter questions
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:23:47 -0700
Subject: Re: More Fighter questions
ScottSaylo@aol.com wrote:
> Bingo! Why waste the hangar space on a spacecraft you can't launch
right now!
> That is consistent with classical carrier usage, the position of lots
of
> spares to replace battle losses is NOT consistent with classic carrier
usage.
> Put me down for the former. Because it is consistent with the wet navy
> ambience FB provides.
I take that the concept of CAP, and the thought of a second strike wave
are not viable concepts in your plans.
Bye for now,
John L.