Re: Updated Electronic Warfare Rules
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:02:44 -0700
Subject: Re: Updated Electronic Warfare Rules
Phillip Pournelle wrote:
> >>Detection range for passive systems is too
> short. It is entirely possible for an unstealthed
> Mass 100 ship (with no thrust, or thrust 2 if it's
> coming at you) to get within 6" of a passive
> civilian ship--or an asteroid of the same size
> could do the same--without being detected at all.
>
XXX
It is wildly unlikely that a real civilian ship will have
passive sensors. As far as a military ship sneaking up on
the civilian, thats why they have the billion dollar sensor/
ECM systems. JTL
XXX
...Snip...more snippage, with most of the content, I agree.
Bye for now,
John L.