Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))
From: "Buddy Chamberlain" <buddy@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 17:01:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))
Ok, thank you. Like I said, I'm not trying to cause a problem here.
Rather, I wanted to make sure there wasn't one. :o)
God bless,
- Buddy
---------------------------------------------
Get paid for surfing the Web!
(I'm dead serious!)
www.alladvantage.com
Referal #: BXL-474
---------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Lesack <lesack@unixg.ubc.ca>
To: <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))
> Buddy Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I was just curious, and a bit concerned. I've grown up in the
computer
> > industry, so I'm used to patents and copyrights and any supposed
> > infringement thereof as being the sparks for nice fat lawsuits. :o)
My
> > only concern was that eidos might have the actual appearance of Lora
Croft
> > copyrighted (in fact, I'd be surprised if they didn't), and thus
making
a
> > miniature witha similar appearance would border on infringement.
I'm
just
> > a concerned fan, that's all.
> >
> > God bless,
> > - Buddy
>
> Yes, but "similar" is not "the same", and bordering on
> infringement is just that, bordering. And there are no laws
> against that. At this time.
>
> Paul
>