Re: HKP and the Kra'Vak
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 20:45:26 +0200
Subject: Re: HKP and the Kra'Vak
Tom Anderson wrote:
> i must say that i'm a little troubled by oerjan's description -
firstly,
> the round needs to be a good conductor, which i would imagine
> precludes making it from depleted uranium or tungsten, although i
> suppose you could put a copper coating around it, and secondly, if
the > accelerating force is
> coming from the current flow throught the round itself, why is a
sabot
> needed? unless that sabot is the bit with the conductor, in which
case it
> all makes perfect sense.
Bingo. The sabot is indeed the conductor; it is necessary mainly
because the ideal shape for a sabot is rather far from the ideal shape
of the rod penetrator <g>
Regards,
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry