Re: [FT] Houserules for bringing MT missiles into FB
From: Jonathan Jarrard <jjarrard@f...>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 10:12:52 -0500
Subject: Re: [FT] Houserules for bringing MT missiles into FB
I don't know. You could allow FT missiles as a salvo missile defense by
making them a separate missile type dedicated to this purpose, rather
like the decoys used in the Honor Harrington books. The HH decoys were
essentially small drone ships with enhanced signatures, ECM, etc. Very
useful for pulling missiles off course, but rather prone to attrition.
Decoy MT missiles wouldn't be worthwhile for smaller ships, but they
might become economical for some of the capital ships. Any thoughts on
cost?
Laserlight wrote:
>
> >Optional rule; if desired, players can use salvo missiles as a long
range
> >missile defence.
>
> I wouldn't allow that. I'd say a missile is small enough that a salvo
> missile couldn't be expected to detect it.
> Of course, if it were allowed, I'd a lot rather have you waste your
SLM on a
> missile than on my ship.
>
> >A missile can attack any target within 6 MU (3MU if employing
optional
> >rules while using 'vector movement')
>
> Insert "at the end of its movement" here.