Re: Spinal Mounts
From: "Robert A. Crawford" <crawford@i...>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:02:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Spinal Mounts
On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 07:48:26AM -0800, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:
> > I've just treated spinal mounts as single-arc beams. For
> >example, a FB 56-mass ship with a Class-4 battery and thrust 6. See
> >http://www.iac.net/~crawford/hobbies/miniatures/full_thrust/clh.html
> >for my example.
> I see. You haven't modified the rules at all. You've just stuck a big
gun
> on a small (comparatively) ship. I can see why it's more effective on
> larger hulls.
Yeah -- no new rules, just a different design. I haven't had
a chance to try this ship out, but I like it on paper. A little
larger ship could carry a Class-5 and a Firecon, but I don't think
it would be as able to take damage. Since I have four of these
figures, I like the thought of having a few of these in a battle
line.
--
Robert Crawford crawford@iac.net
http://www.iac.net/~crawford