Re: [FT][FH]Sumani Incident (or: Battle of the Johns)
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 09:03:08 -0800
Subject: Re: [FT][FH]Sumani Incident (or: Battle of the Johns)
Umm, boss? Ship broke... wrote:
...Snip
> Question, John: if Jon had written the events of 2173's Sumani IV
incident as:
>
> "The Sumani IV incident. ESU and NAC peace negotiators are
assassinated
> during a peace conference. With no other obvious culprit, each side
> believed the other sacrificed their own delegates in order to bring
the
> other down. The Third Solar War intensifies."
>
> how would you have interpreted what had happened? There is absolutely
no
> hint the IF were involved if written this way. Or anyone else, for
that
> matter.
>
>
> Mk
Mk,
It would be up to the player to assign blame,
depending on the background the player wishes to
develop. NAC, ESU, or any third party would be
a valid choice.
Under the conditions you stated, the suggested
location would have been someplace between the two capitals,
with a preferance for a location equidistant from both.
Something like the Stig IV entry, (this event happened)
it needs to be put someplace logical.
Hopeful this will suffice.
Bye for now,
John L.