Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)
From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:26:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, John M. Atkinson wrote:
>
> > 28 Battleships. . . given that I'm looking at a High Space Fleet of
> > 6xSuper Dreadnoughts, 12xDreadnoughts, 5xCVA, 71 cruisers, and about
80
> > escorts, yeah, that's a little bit big.
>
> interesting; you seem to be far more cruiser-heavy. i think around ww1
the
> cruiser was used as a scout, and a bit as a flank guard for the
> battleships. i imagine this is how most ft fleets are - people
> instinctively go for a pyramid of numbers from capitals at the top to
> escorts at the bottom.
>
Now lets look at the NSL ship numbers listed in the fleet book:
15xFighter Carriers, 12xSuperDreadnoughts, 15xBattleDreadnoughts,
13xBattleships,
or
55xDreadnoughts/Battleships, 43xBattleCruisers, 63xCruisers,
85xDestroyers, 44xFrigate, 51xCorvetts
These numbers can be easly put to the German order of battle for Jutland
1916..
Keep a eye on this spot, for a NSL Order of Battle - based on the Fleet
book levels
Steven
Steven Arrowsmith
www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
steven@arrowsmith.net
dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______
I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______