Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)
From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:43:39 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, John M. Atkinson wrote:
> I'm considering doing up something like this. I run into a couple of
> problems--the primary one being that I believe I have seriously
> underestimated the number of escorts and cruisers in the NRE fleet,
> and/or overestimated the number of capitals. I'm going to sit down,
> print yours out, break it out by ship class, subtract 25%, and redo my
> fleet list based on that. :) How's that for imitation being the
> sincerest compliment? I also have to divvy it out based on the four
> fleets. . . Anyway.
>
> John M. Atkinson
>
The way we came up with the break down of our NSL, NAC fleets, was based
on the Order of Battle for the Battle of Jutland 1916 - one of the last
great fleet only battles (i.e. no carriers). It can be found at:
http://history.cc.ukans.edu/~kansite/ww_one/naval/jutob.htm
I know the NSL has a more Austro-Hungarian flavor, but they followed the
German order of battle closely -
A&H Adriatic Squadron 7th Aug 1914;
1st Battleship divison - 3 Dreadnoughts
2nd Battleship divison - 3 Battleships, 1 Cruiser
2nd TorpedoFlotilla - 1 lt.Cruiser, 6 Destroyers, 13 Torpedo Boats
http://history.cc.ukans.edu/~kansite/ww_one/naval/j0400000.htm
Steven
Steven Arrowsmith
www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
steven@arrowsmith.net
dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______
I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______