Re: [FT-AAR] comment NAC/NI AAR

On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
[snip]
> If the re-roll *is* reduced, the Heavy squadron takes 25% less
casualties
[another snip]
> fighters if you use unmodified PDS re-rolls - indeed, I think it is
too
> cheap and should be closer to +21 pts per squadron instead.
> 
>  If you let the "heavy" modification apply to the re-rolls, I'd up the
> cost to at least +36 pts per heavy squadron. That's a lot, but it is

We had some discussion over Heavy fighters a few weeks ago concerning
"Class 1
PDS".  The consensus was to apply the game effects literally, ie: 

  "rolls of "4" have no effect when under PDAF/ADAF or Fighter weapons
fire."

Applying this also affects any rerolls, since that still classifies as
PDS
fire.  

===================================================================
Mark "Hauptmann" Shurtleff
  email: hauptman@sfcmd.com -or- hauptman@concentric.net
  visit the Gear Locker at http://www.sfcmd.com/HeavyGear/

 Finagle's Law:
   The perversity of the Universe tends towards the maximum.
===================================================================