Prev: RE: Directional armor & shields Next: FT-ST thoughts (was: RE: Directional armor & shields)

Re: Hardened Systems

From: "Jonathan White" <zzalsjfw@f...>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:12:37 BST
Subject: Re: Hardened Systems

On 13 Jan 99, at 15:45, John Leary wrote:
> Steven Arrowsmith wrote:
> > Heres our House Rule coving Hardened Systems;
> > Heavy Armour
> > Mass: 3	     Points 15
> > absorbs 3 criticals
>      Very good.   Simple and easy to control/implement.
> Do you have a mass 1, 5 point version: Is this scaleable?
Ermm.. doesn't 'hardened systems' in military jargon refer more to
things 
which are capable of surviving large scale weaponry like nukes? EMP
resistant 
things like that? 
I always though that was what sheilds in FT did. I also always presumed
that 
systems on military ships would be 'hardnened' in that regard /by
default/.

Hi all, BTW. Nice to be back :).

			TTFN
				Jon
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Did you have a good world when you died? Good enough to base a movie
on?"
    - The Doors
Jonathan White, COS group, Manchester University


Prev: RE: Directional armor & shields Next: FT-ST thoughts (was: RE: Directional armor & shields)