Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long)

Thomas Anderson wrote:
>  
> a constitution? never! the nac would have no real constitution, just a
set
> of treaties on which everything is founded. no-one is really sure what
the
> legal basis of the state is.

Hee, hee, hee!	:)