Re: [FT][SG][DS] structure of the NAC

>A sticking point for me in all this is the whole issue of Quebec
joining
at
>all.  I wrote my history with the idea that the Quebecois joined
relatively
>easily, after they were guarenteed protection in the NAC constitution. 
I
>wonder, however, if it would go so smoothly.  If Les Quebecois, after
>trying for three decades to get their independence were to watch a
>race/cultural war in the US, why would they easily leap back into a
>political union akin to a larger version of Canada.  I think, in
>retrospect, that if I were writing this history from the beginning, I
might
>have Quebec not join the NAC right off, and either come to be a member
by
>economic necessity quite a bit later, be taken over by force, or most
>likely, join the FSE - which would throw a wrench into the NAC's happy
world.

Just ship them all to France- it seems that is where they want to be
anyway
;-)

Jared