Prev: RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns Next: RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns

RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns

From: "Tim Jones" <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 17:52:52 -0000
Subject: RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns

>Then number crunching away we get:
>Ave Dmg	Mult	2+	3+	4+	5+	6
>RG1		1	1.111	0.889	0.667	0.444	0.222
>RG2		2	2.500	2.000	1.500	1.000	0.500
>RG3		3	4.167	3.333	2.500	1.667	0.833
>RG4		4	6.111	4.889	3.667	2.444	1.222
>Pulse Torp		2.917	2.333	1.750	1.167	0.583
>

4 class 1's will do 4.444 compared to 1 class 3 4.167
Aren't class 1's still more cost effective? and they
have 2 arcs. Why not up the mass of class 1?

>RG4		30	0.204	0.163	0.122	0.081	0.041
>Pulse Torp	12	0.243	0.194	0.146	0.097	0.049

Aren't PTorps too cost effective now?

-= tim jones =-  


Prev: RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns Next: RE: [FT] "Old" FB Railguns