Prev: GZG History Next: Re: [GZG-L]

Re: Railgun Goals II

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 13:53:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Railgun Goals II

John spake thusly upon matters weighty: 

This is what I had in mind when talking about fire modes. In Raking 
fire, armour would be fully effective, in penetrating mode, maybe 
armour would be ineffective or only max 1 point off. 

> Greetings,
>      While I am being a wet blanket, I thought I would drip on the 
> 'armor penetration' division thing.
>      If the logic behind dividing the damage between the armor
> and the first damage box row is a 'feel good' thing then fine.
> For all practical purposes the armor is mearly an extension 
> of the first damage box row.	 
>      Unless it could be a consideration for the 'K'.	 The RG
> damage could be condidered AP and doing only 1 point to the armor
> and the remainder as internal damage.
>      Oh boy, I just opened another can of worms.   Oh well, I hear
> they have a lot of food value, low fat and all that.
> Bye for now,
> John L.
Thomas Barclay		     
Voice: (613) 831-2018 x 4009
Fax: (613) 831-8255

 "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot.  C++ makes
 it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg."
 -Bjarne Stroustrup

Prev: GZG History Next: Re: [GZG-L]