Re: [ds] modern tanks was Re: [ds] Ogres
From: Chen-Song Qin <cqin@e...>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 18:24:20 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: [ds] modern tanks was Re: [ds] Ogres
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Adrian Johnson wrote:
> Lower is very relative. If an older tank is like the side of a
hanger, an
> M1 is like the side of a barn. Much smaller profile - but it still
sticks
Yes, a tank is still a very large target. But lower tanks would still
be
harder to spot that relatively higher ones, and the size is relative in
DSII. That's why the walkers have a signature of one higher than their
size, because they are too friggin' tall. Also tank or infantry
commanders going after tanks won't be using radar to detect them.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Abkai juse, fucihifusa, ejen sefu, coohai janggin, guwan i besise!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----