Prev: Re: [ds] Ogres Next: Re: [ds] Ogres

Re: [ds] Ogres

From: Kenneth Winland <kwinland@c...>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 02:28:09 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [ds] Ogres


On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Colfox wrote:

> > Reality check.  The target size of an Abrams is smaller then a M60,
> > shouldn't the class size be at most the same???
> Is the M1 really smaller than the M60?   I'm willing to grant you that
> M1 is shorter, but "smaller"?  I guess what I'm saying is that having
> both, I never thought of the M1 as being smaller than the M60.

	Having crawled all over the two, the M1 seems more massive, but
is only slightly "larger".  It is definately shorter!

> Granted, I was a grunt, so I'm not the expert.  I just know that I
> the heck away from them when the treadheads were driving.  They don't
> us "crunchies" for nothing.  :-)

	I had the chance to play around dozens of modern tanks about 8
years ago, but I spent almost all of my time with the WWII-era ones. 
that I am into modern warfare, I keep kicking myself...


Prev: Re: [ds] Ogres Next: Re: [ds] Ogres