RE: [MISC] Bring and Battle

>
>>They are at least a hell of a lot less arrogant than GZG gamers....
>
>This is a rather sweeping generalisation. I'd rather be called a
>Sad Star Trek Space Gamer, who has tried them all and found FT
>to be the space combat game *I* like the best.
>
>They may not very good for B&B gaming, but they aren't designed for
>that sort of gaming encounter (not that wanting to play such games
>is wrong. The point system is too loose and house rules are pivotal
>to the game.
>
>Lets not degenerate into 'my games better than your game'
>because it all comes down to what suits *you*
>
>tim jones
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
>

Not at all.  No game, in my opinion, is intrinsically "better" than any 
other.	Certainly, some games may be better for an individual gamer's 
needs, but that is a different thing.  Hell, in some ways 40K is a 
"better" game than SGII...but that does not mean that I like to play it.
 
I am just saying that a lot of people seem to feel that, by playing GZG 
games, they are somehow superior to the unwashed masses of "other" 
gamers.

This is just not true.	I have met dedicated, fanatical, GW gamers who 
are a lot of fun to play against--and I have met GZG fanatics 
who...scare me.

Tom Sullivan
"Personifiers of the world unite!  You have nothing to lose but Mr. 
Dignity!"  

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com