Re: [DS2]TD Design
From: "Richard Slattery" <richard@m...>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:35:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [DS2]TD Design
On 10 Sep 98, at 15:32, Mikko Kurki-Suonio wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Barry Cadwgan wrote:
>
> > It was more a case of being able to fit a bigger gun (and actually
> > useful) on a chassis you already had a production line set up for.
>
> Yes, I fully agree. But some designs (e.g. StugIII, Hetzer) were
actually
> good AFVs unlike stop-gap measures like Marders.
>
> > The Pz 3, likewise obsolete as a MBT gained a new lease on life as
an
> > assault gun.
>
> Except that StugIII production started long before PzIII became
obsolete.
> Long barrel Stugs did help with T34's before PzIVf2 came out, though.
>
I think I read somewhere that StugIII's as a class got the largest
number of enemy tank kills out of any other class of german
armoured vehicle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Richard Slattery richard@mgkc.demon.co.uk
It was not my class of people. There was not a producer, a press agent,
a director, an actor.
Zsa Zsa Gabor, on the jury used in her assault trial
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~