Re: The World of 2185
From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@i...>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:33:20 +0100
Subject: Re: The World of 2185
At 12:56 12/08/98 -0500, you wrote:
>You wrote:
>
>>are not likely to be shifted) including all of Samoa and Hiawii (its 1
>in >the morning ok). If this upsets you Americans (those of you not
>already >upset at being part of the British Crown again) then just
>think that this >means that the OU also gets some
>Glow-In-The-Dark-Islands like Bikini Athol.
>
>You can have Bikini, Guam, Samoa, and Midway. The only reason the
>various powers snapped up those sort of islands was for coaling
>stations back when this was the limiting factor for naval operations.
>But Hawaii we ought to keep. Or at least partition with the Japanese.
>
>John
>
One point. How important is Earth really? Apart from cultural reasons.
The LLAR seems to do OK with no territories on Earth. Israel too.
--------------------
Niall Gilsenan,
DIT Cathal Brugha St,
Dublin 1,
Ireland.
ngilsena@indigo.ie
--------------------
The miscellany (Sci-Fi combat games)
http://members.tripod.com/~Cwintel/Scifi.html