Re: Communication and Travel
From: jatkins6@i... (John Atkinson)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 23:55:32 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Communication and Travel
You wrote:
>The 'probably' is rather important.
It's a non-issue. Tanks are fun and easy to kill. Mines, satchel
charges, shoulder-fired rockets.
>True, my example was extreme. Chechen versus Russians is minor power
>using much the same technology as Russians (a second line
>'technological war machine'), with the Russians not commiting front
>line troops (In fact, I think they were raw conscripts mainly) due to
>political machinations back 'home'.
Notes: First, Chechens had mainly the contents of local reserve unit
armories, and then could not operate the heavier weapons they found.
Second, entire Russian Army is "Raw Conscripts". I know at least one
division of armor was Guards Tank division, and they also committed
Guards Parachute division(s?). Of course, that's a comment more on
sad, sad shape of current Ruskie army than on military prowess of
Chechens.
>Americans versus Vietnamese, I think you will find the american
>military complaining that their political policies lost them the war.
>Although, I'll readily admit it still would have been difficult
>without that.
*Snx* Name a single encounter where the Vietnamese didn't come away
worse for the experience. Tactically, we had them beat cold.
John M. Atkinson