RE: Mines, detection of
From: John Skelly <canjns@c...>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 01:42:43 -0400
Subject: RE: Mines, detection of
John, I did mention that these methods were used with no fear of enemy
intervention. I posted it more for interest sake, capice? ;-) You
mentioned VTOLs for mine detection, what about some rules on specialized
vehicles (flail tank and the like)?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jatkins6@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:jatkins6@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 1998 10:29 PM
> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: Mines, detection of
>
> You wrote:
>
> >Around dusk they'd fly over a suspected or known minefield in a
> >helicopter. Scanning the ground with an IR scope, certain mines
> would
> >show up due too the difference in temperatures between the mines and
> the >cooling ground around them.
>
> That 'some' makes me nervous. :) But then again I'm a nervous kinda
> guy. SGLI is all well and good in theory, but I don't want my next o'
>
> kin to find out how good it is in practice, capice?[1] I think I
> permitted mine detectors in VTOLs, flying low and slow. If not I
> should have.
>
> >Sheep herds would be used. Bad for sheep, but better a dead sheep
> than >a dead person. They would literally drive a sheep herd over a
> field and >see if anything was tripped.
>
> Good method, but has the major disadvantage that if your enemy has a
> large-caliber machine gun overwatching the minefield (as he should). .
>
> . Not really practical in combat, I'd say.
>
> >The coolest thing about these methods is the mix of low tech and high
> >tech.
>
> When it all comes down, there is still no substitute for a sapper with
>
> a stick, probing carefully once every inch.
>
> [1]SGLI, Serviceman's Group Life Insurance, the only life insurance
> policy that specifically covers acts of war.
>
> John M. Atkinson